The remarks were made in response to FDA’ request for comments on its draft titled Labeling of Plant-Based Milk Alternatives and Voluntary Nutrient Statements: Guidance for Industry. Issued in February, the draft would permit plant-based items to be marketed as “milk” provided they meet certain labeling requirements.
Plant-based beverage producers and advocates for dairy alternatives applauded the new rules. Dairy farmers and representatives from milk producing states were less enthusiastic. In response to the draft, Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D- Wisc., re-introduced a bipartisan bill called the Dairy Pride Act. It seeks to codify the definition of “milk” as dairy based into law. The bill is now being considered by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
In their comments, AFBF officials say non-dairy products marketed as “milk” cause confusion and are misleading to consumers. They suggest the FDA adhere to guidelines similar to Canada, which mandates the term “almond beverage” instead of almond “milk.” According to Farm Bureau, this would not be a heavy or unreasonable burden on plant-based beverage producers.