A new survey has revealed that 98% of dairy farmers care about sustainability, but are concerned that their industry is being made the ‘sustainability scapegoat’.
Dairy farmers care about sustainability amid 'scapegoat' concerns
The survey, compiled by KW Feeds, reveals dairy farmers are concerned about balancing environmental goals with profitability

The survey, compiled by KW Feeds, reveals dairy farmers are concerned about balancing environmental goals with profitability.

However, almost all of those questioned overwhelmingly recognise sustainability is important to their business.

The survey did, however, highlight concerns over a lack of clarity when quantifying environmental credentials.

In the survey, 98% of the dairy producers questioned agreed that sustainability was important, with 84% already auditing their farm, or planning to do so.

However, the majority (79%) were doing so in response to retailer or processor pressure.

Responses revealed some concern to the parameters of different measurements, with experiences of several audits by all the major supermarkets, returning a variety of different results.

Given this experience, one respondent questioned the reliability of the auditing process, concerned it was ‘making a mockery’ of what they feel is ‘an already dubious sustainability agenda, making farming the scapegoat’.

Despite this, Charlotte Ward, ruminant technical manager at KW Feeds, says the survey shows a positive approach to more sustainable farming activities.

These include the associated operational costs, as long as milk prices reflect the changes, and consumers are prepared to pay for it.

“The majority of farmers we spoke to are optimistic about the benefits of operating in a more sustainable way, even if the costs may be higher now,” she says.

“Many felt that in reality, these changes will be self-funding due to improving efficiencies. Essentially there is a short-term cost for a longer-term gain, for the benefit of us all.”

The vast majority (96%) of those surveyed felt that using UK feed options were either important or semi-important, not just down to cost, but also from a sustainability perspective (69%).

It was felt home-grown options would support the British farmer, reduce potential supply chain and foreign exchange risk, while also helping support sustainability.

The importance of good rationing is also seen as key to getting the full sustainability potential from UK feed.

“Accurate rationing formulation, for example only feeding the required amount of protein throughout the housing and grazing periods, was one key area highlighted, and this relies on reliable feed and nutritional advice, supply and support,” says Ms Ward.

The survey also looked at manure management, a subject increasingly on the agenda.

Over half (57%) had considered changing manure management methods through a variety of means including the use of dribble bars, using additives to cut emissions or covering slurry stores.

However, none of the respondents mentioned livestock management measures, and only 13% had looked at using products to reduce methane emissions in the herd.

“Our survey shows that farmers are wanting to be more sustainable,” says Ms Ward. “There is increased recognition that this is important to the consumer, and if UK producers expect the public to eat and buy locally, they should be doing likewise with their own sourcing.

“While there is clearly a nervousness around hitting the balance between sustainability and profitability, and the lack of a standard across the industry, dairy farmers remain positive they are making a difference for the long-term.”

A reader sent us a lengthy email speaking to Rick Naerebout, Chief Executive Officer for the Idaho Dairymen’s Association. Here is his letter:

You may be interested in

Related
notes

Most Read

Featured

Join to

Follow us

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER