
Economist Al Mussell warns that U.S. demands to bypass Canadian processors for direct grocery shelf access threaten supply-management stability.
As bilateral negotiations between Ottawa and Washington race against tariff deadlines, the allocation of cheese import quotas under CUSMA/USMCA has resurfaced as a central flashpoint in the Canada–U.S. trade relationship. While the Trump administration has used threats of 50 percent punitive tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian goods to demand concessions, agricultural economists warn that changing how Canada allocates its tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) would disrupt the domestic processing sector and undermine the country’s supply-management architecture.
At the heart of the dispute is not simply the overall volume of dairy entering Canada, but who receives import licenses to distribute it. The United States argues that Canada’s TRQ allocation framework unfairly discriminates against American exporters by granting import permits primarily to domestic dairy processors and distributors while excluding grocery retailers. Washington contends that because Canadian retailers were granted direct quota access under Canada’s Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with the European Union, U.S. specialty cheese manufacturers are placed at a competitive disadvantage in reaching Canadian supermarket shelves directly.
Speaking to BNN Bloomberg, Al Mussell, agricultural economist and fellow-in-residence at the C.D. Howe Institute, cautioned that granting direct import rights to major grocery chains is not in Canada’s economic interest. Mussell pointed out that opening direct retail channels would not increase total cheese import volumes—as existing CUSMA quotas are already essentially filled—but would instead shift high-margin retail shelf space away from Canadian manufacturers. Furthermore, because domestic dairy plants rely on regulated, planned raw milk allocations under supply management, dislodging domestic processing volumes would complicate pooling operations and farmgate planning.
The current friction comes despite formal dispute panels already validating Canada’s regulatory approach. While an initial CUSMA panel ruled against Canada’s initial practice of allocating quota exclusively to domestic processors, Canada revised its framework to include distributors. When the U.S. challenged the exclusion of retailers in a second panel, the dispute settlement body ruled in Canada’s favor, finding its rules fully compliant with the treaty. Mussell noted that U.S. efforts to circumvent binding dispute panel determinations through external tariff threats set a troubling precedent for rules-based trade.
Beyond commercial access, the debate also touches on divergent dairy quality and testing standards between the two nations. Mussell highlighted that milk meeting standard U.S. Grade A criteria would not be legally saleable in Canadian provinces due to stricter domestic quality thresholds, adding that recent cuts to U.S. federal lab monitoring have increased uncertainty around testing rigor. As Canadian negotiators defend the dairy sector against broader trade pressures, the cheese quota conflict underscores the deep structural divide between Canada’s planned supply management and the export-driven U.S. dairy model.
Source: BNN Bloomberg
You can now read the most important #news on #eDairyNews #Whatsapp channels!!!
🇺🇸 eDairy News INGLÊS: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaKsjzGDTkJyIN6hcP1K









